What is the difference between flv and avi

Therefore, you may need to install additional codecs or codec packs to play certain AVI files. Social Connection. File Extension. It is a video compression format which is the product of the Microsoft. It is the original video format designed for internet videos against Real Video. It is also a audio video saving format which is developed by the Apple Inc.

It is also a type of format which is used to store videos and uses same lossy type compression for the purpose resulting in ordinary result video. It is a multimedia video container which is produced by the formats for playing the high quality videos and audios in DVD quality. MP4 is the high quality video format which is used to play and store video files. MPG is a video format which is used mostly in mobiles. Subscribe via RSS Home. What is the Difference between Mp4, Flv, Mp3, Wmv, Mov, Mpeg, Avi and Mpg There are many things which are done in order to secure the memories and other memorable moments and for this reason videos are made.

Comparisons of MP4 and FLV tend to focus on chief features and the versatility of uses that are expected of any video file format:. MP4 reportedly stores both video and audio digital coding in good quality. Opinion on this is less definite on FLV, but the pros and cons of FLV usually do not focus on the quality of the file format. MP4 is notable for less loss of quality with higher degrees of compression. It can store data types other than video and audio, such as object descriptors, scene descriptors, and other object-oriented file structures.

On this issue, there is almost no debate. MP4 can be used on almost all platforms, devices, applications, and file drivers. Most platforms not only support MP4 use but have dedicated MP4 decoding hardware. FLV seems to be favored for streaming video on the web.

It is compatible with most web browsers, but not with mobile browsers — obviously, an increasingly serious limitation as smartphones and a host of other mobile devices are coming to dominate internet connectivity, especially — but far from exclusively — among younger generations.

Because most platforms have dedicated MP4 decoding hardware, MP4 seems to playback smoothly on almost any platform, including mobile devices. As mentioned, FLV works best for streaming videos on the internet and does not play at all on most mobile devices. FLV works well for sharing videos online and for uploading, for example to YouTube.

In this context, the single biggest advantage of FLV format is commonly reported to be that it can play inside a webpage but using the Flash browser plug-in. And FLV files are usually very small and can be easily downloaded by web surfers who want to copy the video. A notable and increasingly criticized aspect of FLV is that a Flash Player plug-in is needed to play the FLV video files, which is why they won't work on mobile devices, among other platforms.

A plug-in is not usually required for playing back video in the MP4 file format. For playback, FLV files are not always hardware accelerated, either. It is often mentioned, though hardly as the headline, that the MP4 files tend to use less battery than many other video file formats. That certainly can be an edge when it comes to its use on mobile devices, where MP4 is used while FLV is not.

And that both are still very widely used. Of course, the backing of the mighty Adobe brand name may account for some of this staying power.